![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tophat paired end alignment. | adeslat | SOLiD | 5 | 08-07-2011 04:05 AM |
Support for parallelization of paired-end alignments with BWA | Fabien Campagne | Bioinformatics | 0 | 12-17-2010 05:40 AM |
Does Cufflinks support single-end and paired end data together ? | ersenkavak | Bioinformatics | 1 | 10-22-2010 08:26 AM |
BEDTools: new tools / support for paired-end features. | quinlana | Bioinformatics | 3 | 11-19-2009 06:30 AM |
how paired end alignment works? | totalnew | Bioinformatics | 8 | 04-27-2009 01:46 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Miami Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Is it because that if a read includes a paired-end, it is not easily to be found out by the current software? but why?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Rick Westerman
Location: Purdue University, Indiana, USA Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,104
|
![]() Quote:
(A) Yes, of course pair end alignment support is important. One can get more the double the information from paired ends -- e.g., the reads themselves plus the distance between them. Chaison & Pavner have an interesting paper in Genome Research commenting on the importance of paired ends. (B) While I suspect some alignment programs do not have paired end support it is hardly missing from many packages. It has been around The Roche-provided 'newbler' program does pair-end assembly. The ABI-provided 'corona' program does paired-end matching to a reference. That latter is not assembly per se but then the ABI SOLiD is not designed for de-novo assembly because of the short read lengths. Perhaps your question more revolves around assembly of very short reads? Or perhaps your question revolves around the mis-assembly due to repeat regions? In any case please restate your question more coherently. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|