![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
tophat paired end read alignment | idyll_ty | Bioinformatics | 0 | 02-18-2012 10:58 PM |
Tophat paired end alignment help: comma or blank to separate two pairs? | mediator | Bioinformatics | 3 | 01-31-2012 09:44 AM |
Tophat paired end alignment. | adeslat | SOLiD | 5 | 08-07-2011 04:05 AM |
Tophat - Error using Paired End | jling | Bioinformatics | 0 | 02-10-2010 11:26 AM |
how paired end alignment works? | totalnew | Bioinformatics | 8 | 04-27-2009 01:46 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Location: New England Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
|
![]()
Hi All,
I was running Tophat1.4.1 to do a pair-end alignment but got err=-11. Here is the command I used: module load bowtie/0.12.7 module load tophat/1.4.1 tophat -m 2 -p 16 -r 210 -o <output dir> <hg19_index> /data/PE_read_1.fastq /data/PE_read_2.fastq Output: Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 224
|
![]()
I would try dropping the -m 2 option. The issue might be that by allowing 2 mismatches in an anchor region only 8 bp long, you are getting a lot of potential matches that are making junction mapping difficult.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: New England Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
|
![]()
@pbluescript
Will try that, thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|