![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about Cufflinks and reference annotations | mhayes | Bioinformatics | 1 | 03-23-2015 07:40 PM |
GC bias correction | Robby | Bioinformatics | 0 | 07-18-2011 08:38 AM |
cufflinks segmentation fault help please | seq_newbie | Bioinformatics | 1 | 06-29-2011 12:52 PM |
Segmentation fault when running Cufflinks | doggysaywhat | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 03-30-2011 11:48 AM |
cufflinks hates my long reads: segmentation faults on bwa output | dagarfield | Bioinformatics | 1 | 02-03-2011 08:20 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: baltimore Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 89
|
![]()
Hi:
I am using: bowtie-0.12.5. tophat-1.2.0 cufflinks v1.0.3 while running: cufflinks -p 4 -N -G Homo_sapiens.NCBI36.52.fixed.gtf -b hg18.fa -M masked.gtf accepted_hits.bam I always hit segmentation fault while cufflinks tried to bias correct chrNT contigs in ensembl GTF file. I teased this on cluster, standalone and other machines. After removing chrNT contig annotations from GTF file, finally cufflinks progressed further. why would chrNT contigs help segementation fault in cufflinks? Could you please share your opinion or reasons why this could be? Also is there a danger removing chrNT contigs from GTF file. thanks for you time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|