![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FastQC per base sequence content | analyst | Bioinformatics | 14 | 02-15-2017 07:25 AM |
FastQC,kmer content, per base sequence content: is this good enough | mgg | Bioinformatics | 10 | 11-06-2013 11:45 PM |
Kmer content | subuhikhan | General | 9 | 03-05-2012 01:05 AM |
FastQC - strange 'per base sequence content' graph | gconcepcion | Bioinformatics | 11 | 10-31-2011 01:39 AM |
Umbalanced content of complementary bases in DNA-seq paired-ends | ratope | Bioinformatics | 5 | 09-28-2011 08:54 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: California Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 32
|
![]()
I have seen odd kmer content in the first bases of Illumina reads in my data and others. Does anyone have an idea about why this is? The barcodes were trimmed already by the Cassava pipeline. Here are some examples that I found on the web for different species:
http://genomevolution.org/wiki/index...rst_Run_FastQC http://www.msi.umn.edu/~ztu/RNAseq/fastqc_report.html https://notendur.hi.is/haj16/fastqc_report.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Simon Andrews
Location: Babraham Inst, Cambridge, UK Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 871
|
![]()
These sorts of pattern are pretty common (almost to the point of being universal) in RNA-Seq libraries. Apparently it's the 'random' hexamer priming which isn't as random as you might hope.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 64
|
![]() Quote:
Hansen, K.D., Brenner, S.E. & Dudoit, S. Biases in Illumina transcriptome sequencing caused by random hexamer priming. Nucleic Acids Res 38, e131–e131 (2010) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20395217) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|