![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cufflinks-1.0.3 produces very high FPKM values when compared to cufflinks-0.9.3. Why? | pinki999 | Bioinformatics | 5 | 06-09-2012 07:48 AM |
Cufflinks cufflinks v1.0.3 - segmentation fault bias correction chrNT annotations | adrian | Bioinformatics | 0 | 06-08-2011 02:28 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: boston Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Hi,
i'm getting Read type 0bp singled-end in the output of cufflinks, even it is 75bp. And, In the gene.fpkm/isoform file, it has lots of zero counts. HTML Code:
$ cufflinks -o /cufflinks/ -p 4 -g /mm9 accepted_hits.sam You are using Cufflinks v1.1.0, which is the most recent release. [bam_header_read] EOF marker is absent. [bam_header_read] invalid BAM binary header (this is not a BAM file). File accepted_hits.sam doesn't appear to be a valid BAM file, trying SAM... [15:21:02] Loading reference annotation. [15:21:04] Inspecting reads and determining fragment length distribution. > Processed 29955 loci. [*************************] 100% > Map Properties: > Total Map Mass: 20845338.50 > #####NOTE HERE##### ====>>> Read Type: 0bp single-end > Fragment Length Distribution: Truncated Gaussian (default) > Default Mean: 200 > Default Std Dev: 80 [15:23:56] Assembling transcripts and estimating abundances. > Waiting for 2 threads to complete. [************************ ] 99% > Waiting for 1 threads to complete. [************************ ] 99% > Processed 29955 loci. [*************************] 100% Last edited by victoryhe; 10-18-2011 at 05:02 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Granada, Spain Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12
|
![]()
Why don't you try using the BAM file instead of the SAM one?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|