SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Literature Watch



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PubMed: A Comparison of Parallel Pyrosequencing and Sanger Clone-Based Sequencing and Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 11-01-2011 03:00 AM
PubMed: Next-generation DNA sequencing-based assay for measuring allelic expression i Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 10-23-2011 03:40 AM
PubMed: Pipeline for Large-Scale Microdroplet Bisulfite PCR-Based Sequencing Allows t Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 07-14-2011 07:20 AM
PubMed: Comparative analysis of pyrosequencing and QMC-PCR in conjunction with high r Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 01-05-2011 07:20 AM
PubMed: Comparison of DNA pyrosequencing with alternative methods for identification Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 04-18-2008 07:10 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-20-2009, 03:00 AM   #1
Newsbot!
RSS Posting Maniac
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,443
Default PubMed: Comparison of bisulfite sequencing PCR with pyrosequencing for measuring diff

Syndicated from PubMed RSS Feeds

Comparison of bisulfite sequencing PCR with pyrosequencing for measuring differences in DNA methylation.

Anal Biochem. 2009 Oct 13;

Authors: Reed K, Poulin ML, Yan L, Parissenti AM

DNA methylation strongly affects chromatin structure and the regulation of gene expression. For many years, bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) has served as the "gold standard" for measuring DNA methylation. However, with the evolution of pyrosequencing as a tool to evaluate DNA methylation, the need arises to compare the relative efficiencies of the two techniques in measuring DNA methylation. We provide for the first time a direct assessment of BSP and pyrosequencing to detect and quantify hypomethylation, hypermethylation and mixed methylation of the ABCB1 promoter in various drug-sensitive and drug-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines through head-to-head experimentation. Our findings indicate that while both methods can reliably detect increased, decreased, and mixed methylation of DNA, BSP appears to be more sensitive than pyrosequencing at detecting strong hypermethylation of DNA. However, we also observed greater variability in the methylation of CpG sites by BSP, possibly due to the additional bacterial cloning step required by BSP over pyrosequencing. BSP and pyrosequencing equally detected hypomethylation and mixed methylation of DNA. The ability of pyrosequencing to reliably detect differences in DNA methylation across cell populations without requiring the cloning of bisulfite-treated DNA into bacterial expression vectors was seen as a major advantage of this technique.

PMID: 19835834 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



More...
Newsbot! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO