![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IUPAC coded reference sequences | data | Bioinformatics | 9 | 11-29-2011 08:50 PM |
BWA & Reverse Sequences | dp05yk | Bioinformatics | 1 | 06-14-2011 08:15 PM |
BWA: reference sequences longer than 4GB | ElMichael | Bioinformatics | 1 | 06-06-2011 01:22 PM |
cuffcompare not matching reference genome | genec | Bioinformatics | 11 | 06-08-2010 10:35 AM |
BWA and masking sequences... | spindrift | Bioinformatics | 4 | 02-17-2010 11:20 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: CSHL Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Hi,
I'm doing this as a sanity check. I'm using BWA to align simulated reads to a reference genome, and I'm noticing that in the SAM file, when a read maps to the reverse complement, the reported start position is for the 3' end of the original reverse complemented query sequence (the 5' position of the read in the forward strand in the genome). Also, BWA appears to reverse complement the original query sequence and reverse the quality string. Did I get that right? I'm just trying to make sure I thoroughly understand BWA's output. Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: CSHL Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Thanks dawe!
I've looked at the SAM manual a number of times, but I seem to have always missed that note.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
bwa, sequence alignment |
Thread Tools | |
|
|