![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pysam: a python wrapper of samtools | TGBelgard | Bioinformatics | 36 | 01-28-2016 03:13 AM |
How to read pysam SNPCaller output? | aggp11 | Bioinformatics | 2 | 07-11-2011 10:12 AM |
pysam pileup wierdness | mbreese | Bioinformatics | 1 | 06-29-2011 01:04 PM |
Problem with pysam.Samfile | mingyu | Bioinformatics | 5 | 10-26-2010 12:36 AM |
coverage by strand with pysam | desaila | Bioinformatics | 1 | 10-15-2010 12:54 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Ireland Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 13
|
![]()
Hi,
I'm trying to count allelic frequencies at SNPs and Pysam seems to be the best solution to do that. However, when I make a call to get the number of reads that occur at a single site I get many more sites than expected. Example: len(list(f.pileup(reference='chr1',start=1756880,end=1756881))) gives a result of 135 as opposed to the expected value of 1 and len(list(f.pileup(reference='chr1',start=1756870,end=1756881))) gives a result of 146 as opposed to 10. Can anyone please explain what is going on? Regards, P. Korir |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Marburg, Germany Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 110
|
![]()
I suspect that pileup givess you pileups for every base covered by a read that was within the query range.
edit: You might want to print the pos of each PileupColumn. for p in f.pileup(...): print p.pos, p.n ... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Ireland Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 13
|
![]()
Thanks for your reply ffinkernagel.
Well, I'm surprised that when I give it a query range of 1 it gives more than one result. Anyway, I have used the for loop like in your suggestion though the solution is not as clean as I wanted it to be. f.pileup() returns an iterator. I'm not proficient in the use of iterators. P. Korir |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: Marburg, Germany Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 110
|
![]()
you simply do
for something in my_iterator: do_something_with(something) no difference to a list there. The for loop should tell you if my hunch is correct. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: Ireland Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 13
|
![]()
OK. I'll give it a shot.
Thank you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
allele frequency, not working, pileup, pysam, snp |
Thread Tools | |
|
|