SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor quality 2nd end from paired-end sequencing on HiSeq agent99 Illumina/Solexa 6 05-03-2013 09:53 AM
scaffolding GAII paired-end library with Hiseq mate-pairs stevebaeyen Bioinformatics 17 02-27-2013 01:45 AM
MetaSim: why paired end reverse read is much shorter than forward read?? gen_argentino Bioinformatics 0 09-06-2012 06:38 AM
How to make HiSeq indexed paired-end library with homemade oligos? ostrakon Illumina/Solexa 6 03-16-2012 04:22 AM
Illumina second read quality drop wouter Illumina/Solexa 4 11-01-2010 05:40 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-19-2013, 04:05 AM   #1
anurupa
Member
 
Location: india

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 14
Default Quality drop in the Reverse read of paired end library (illumina Hiseq 1000)

Hi
Recently we have prepared 3 paired end libraries (2X100) and sequenced on illumina hiseq 1000. we have checked the quality of the sequenced reads and found that for one library both forward and reverse reads showed good quality fatsQC reports. However for other 2 libraries the fastQC report for forward read (R1) is very good. But the fastQC report for reverse read is looking really bad (especially the per base quality score). I suppose if there is any problem with the library preparation then it should affect both the reads (R1, R2) which is not the case here.Could anyone let me know the reason why this is happening?


Thanks

Last edited by anurupa; 10-19-2013 at 04:17 AM.
anurupa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 07:55 AM   #2
kohanlon
Junior Member
 
Location: Virginia

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3
Default

I saw a similar problem with some of my libraries and after sending data to Illumina, found that my libraries were too concentrated. When the cluster density gets too high, the second read quality can be affected significantly. The instrument has trouble doing the turnaround when there are so many clusters so your Qscores drop off. You should be able to look at your images and see if you have a higher density of clusters at the front of the flow cell or at the back. If the clusters have a higher density at the back of the flow cell, it is an indication of over clustering and could be the cause of your drop in Qscores. I would try using a lower concentration of your library for the input and see if that clears up the problem.
kohanlon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 10:40 PM   #3
anurupa
Member
 
Location: india

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 14
Default

we have loaded three libraries in a single lane (multiplexed). As mentioned out of 3 libraries 1 library din't show any problem for forward(R1) and reverse(R2). we have checked the cluster density which is ~600 k/mm2. I think it is optimal value and the problem arises only if it is above 900 k/mm2
anurupa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO