![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Assemblathon:Unable to reproduce results reported for SOAPdenovo | Mahtab | Bioinformatics | 0 | 12-21-2011 05:01 PM |
GATK / DepthofCoverage | nguyendofx | Bioinformatics | 0 | 11-07-2011 11:21 AM |
FS tag in GATK | ulz_peter | Bioinformatics | 0 | 10-10-2011 01:42 AM |
GATK help! | adaptivegenome | Bioinformatics | 0 | 01-17-2011 08:01 PM |
TopHat: ambiguous hits are only reported for one of the two paired end reads | GoneSouth | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 01-19-2010 10:34 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
|
![]()
I am using Unified Genotyper for SNP calling. I find that the reported Allele depths and read depths seem much lower than expected (with and without the base quality recalibration). I did the alignment using CLC bio and have a SNP file from CLC bio which reports the coverage at the SNP position of reads that passed the quality filter. I understand the reported coverage values may not be exact but for equivalent quality scores, I find the DP from GATK to be 10% or 20% of the CLC bio coverage. Has anyone else seen this? Does GATK scale down the coverage?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
|
![]()
it turned out I had to set Downsampling to None. My AD and DP were under reported due to the downsampling.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
gatk coverage dp |
Thread Tools | |
|
|