![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
minimum depth variant calling samtools/gatk | m_elena_bioinfo | Bioinformatics | 1 | 12-06-2011 09:31 AM |
GATK / DepthofCoverage | nguyendofx | Bioinformatics | 0 | 11-07-2011 11:21 AM |
GATK - DepthOfCoverage | giverny | Bioinformatics | 2 | 09-14-2011 02:48 PM |
depth of coverage outputs gatk | m_elena_bioinfo | Bioinformatics | 0 | 09-07-2011 03:58 AM |
GATK depthofcoverage | foxyg | Bioinformatics | 1 | 08-21-2010 10:22 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Montreal Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 63
|
![]()
I have a sample on which custom capture was done. Many of the baits have >2000x coverage.
When running DepthOfCoverage initially I never saw values >500x but then noticed I forgot to set the bins bigger. I set them at 20,000 just to be safe, now no values go over 1000...I really don't get why. I even set a summaryCoverageThreshold at 1200 and it's always 0. With genome browser I can clearly see some baits at >2000 even some at 5000. Any ideas Here's the command: Code:
java -jar /data/solexa/aligners/GenomeAnalysisTK-1.0.5777/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T DepthOfCoverage -R human_hg19.fasta -I sample.bam -o sample.targetCoverage -L all.interval_list --minMappingQuality 15 --minBaseQuality 10 --omitDepthOutputAtEachBase --logging_level ERROR --summaryCoverageThreshold 30 --summaryCoverageThreshold 50 --summaryCoverageThreshold 200 --summaryCoverageThreshold 500 --summaryCoverageThreshold 700 --summaryCoverageThreshold 1000 --summaryCoverageThreshold 1200 --summaryCoverageThreshold 2000 --start 1 --stop 20000 --nBins 19999 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Montreal Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 63
|
![]()
I finally found my answer.
By default GATK downsamples by sample. The downsampling coverage is...drum roll...1000. To fix this set the number of bins *AND* set -dt NONE Why one would downsample when computing coverage is beyond me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
|
![]()
Thanks! looks like this also happens in the Unified Genotyper in reporting the AD and DP numbers. I was struggling to explain why the DP did not match the coverage at the position and if the quality filters were being too stringent!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
coverage, coverage calculation, gatk, gatk depthofcoverage |
Thread Tools | |
|
|