Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
smallRNA annotation NicoBxl Bioinformatics 8 07-18-2012 09:11 AM
Velvet Assembler: expected coverage versus estimated coverage versus effective covera DMCH Bioinformatics 1 11-30-2011 04:21 AM
Help with smallRNA Truseq kit - Agilent results? Tali7 Illumina/Solexa 5 09-14-2011 10:04 AM
Help with smallRNA Truseq kit - Agilent results? (repost from Illumina forum) Tali7 RNA Sequencing 2 08-03-2011 12:05 AM
smallRNA data dnusol Bioinformatics 1 02-21-2011 11:38 PM

Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2011, 03:48 PM   #1
Junior Member
Location: West coast

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Default smallRNA v1.5 versus TruSEQ

Hi all,

I have sequenced the same small RNA sample using v1.5 or TruSEQ.
As one might expect the data was overall similar, but what I have noticed is that RNAs that are 17-19 bp long (trimmed versions of mature microRNAs) were detected by v1.5 , but not by TruSEQ.

So, I was wondering whether anybody knows the difference between these procedures that can explain the bias?

Fiji_surf is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO