![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
QDD, a free software to analyze microsatellites from NGS data | martinjf | Bioinformatics | 3 | 07-31-2019 12:36 AM |
Microsatellites development with Next G. seq + Illumina transcriptome analysis | Alexander Tchourbanov | Bioinformatics | 2 | 10-07-2012 05:42 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: leuven Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Dear all,
I was wondering if any of you have information on sequencing microsatellite repeats (amplicons) on a 454 platform. Essentially, I would like to get some information on the accuracy when sequencing microsatellite amplicons. Do you get the two alleles (e.g. heterozygotes) in equal proportions or do you get a distribution of several repeat lengths due to pcr-errors? If so, what kind of coverage (50x, 100x) do you need to estimate the "correct" alleles? And is there any difference between di-, tri, tetra or penta-repeats as you would expect? I would be gratefull if any of you could point me to some papers on this topic or share your experience. Thanks! Note: I do not ask for info on how to use 454 seq to develop new microsats. There are plenty of papers on that. Last edited by koen de gelas; 07-27-2011 at 11:43 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: Mexico City Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hi Koen,
I am wondering the same thing. Please if you have any information of some labs that have already tried this methodology please let me know. In our lab we are thinking of a pilot project using Illumina for amplicon sequencing. But I would like to know if there is some body that have tryied and pros and cons of the technique, actually for me is strange that no-body has published about this issue. Thanks for you post and looking forward for any help |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
454, amplicon sequencing, microsatellite, pcr errors |
Thread Tools | |
|
|