SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Literature Watch



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RNA-Seq: A comparison of statistical methods for detecting differentially expressed g Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 01-24-2012 02:00 AM
RNA-Seq: A multiplex RNA-seq strategy to profile poly(A(+)) RNA: Application to analy Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 04-26-2011 04:00 AM
RNA-Seq: Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 08-17-2010 02:00 AM
PubMed: Comparison of DNA pyrosequencing with alternative methods for identification Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 04-18-2008 06:10 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-21-2010, 02:00 AM   #1
Newsbot!
RSS Posting Maniac
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,443
Default RNA-Seq: Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identi

Syndicated from PubMed RSS Feeds

Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications.

Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Sep 19;

Authors: Harris RA, Wang T, Coarfa C, Nagarajan RP, Hong C, Downey SL, Johnson BE, Fouse SD, Delaney A, Zhao Y, Olshen A, Ballinger T, Zhou X, Forsberg KJ, Gu J, Echipare L, O'Geen H, Lister R, Pelizzola M, Xi Y, Epstein CB, Bernstein BE, Hawkins RD, Ren B, Chung WY, Gu H, Bock C, Gnirke A, Zhang MQ, Haussler D, Ecker JR, Li W, Farnham PJ, Waterland RA, Meissner A, Marra MA, Hirst M, Milosavljevic A, Costello JF

Analysis of DNA methylation patterns relies increasingly on sequencing-based profiling methods. The four most frequently used sequencing-based technologies are the bisulfite-based methods MethylC-seq and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), and the enrichment-based techniques methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeDIP-seq) and methylated DNA binding domain sequencing (MBD-seq). We applied all four methods to biological replicates of human embryonic stem cells to assess their genome-wide CpG coverage, resolution, cost, concordance and the influence of CpG density and genomic context. The methylation levels assessed by the two bisulfite methods were concordant (their difference did not exceed a given threshold) for 82% for CpGs and 99% of the non-CpG cytosines. Using binary methylation calls, the two enrichment methods were 99% concordant and regions assessed by all four methods were 97% concordant. We combined MeDIP-seq with methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme (MRE-seq) sequencing for comprehensive methylome coverage at lower cost. This, along with RNA-seq and ChIP-seq of the ES cells enabled us to detect regions with allele-specific epigenetic states, identifying most known imprinted regions and new loci with monoallelic epigenetic marks and monoallelic expression.

PMID: 20852635 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



More...
Newsbot! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO