What are the best methods/programs for attempting to close gaps between scaffolds after a de novo assembly has resulted in a large number of scaffolds (before resorting to further sequencing)?
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
First, I don't know why you've chosen to prefix all your posts with your username; not a desirable strategy.
Second, you've failed to describe any details about the genomes you are working on, the data you've acquired & how you've tried to assemble. The size & complexity of the genome are critical to understand as well what you have in hand and what scientific goals you really want to address.
-
Okay, apologies for the previous comment.
There are a number of scaffolders out there, though I have used only SSPACE and without digging in much.
One thing that would benefit all of these programs is if there was a rigorous language for defining relationships that scaffolding might be based on. Ideally this would a XML; I know many folks aren't XML fans but the value of being able to validate inputs is powerful.
One distinction amongst scaffolders is their modularity. To give two examples, SSPACE is non-modular and must be run en masse. At the other extreme, SGA can apparently be used as a scaffolder & simply takes BAM files and a few parameters.
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...-
Channel: Articles
04-22-2024, 07:01 AM -
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 11:49 AM
|
0 responses
13 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 11:49 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-24-2024, 08:47 AM
|
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-24-2024, 08:47 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
61 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
Comment