SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TruSeq nano library changes? anna_m Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 12-21-2015 03:04 AM
Problems with kit 600 cycles Mario Moreno Illumina/Solexa 14 04-22-2015 03:12 PM
Degraded gDNA & TruSeq Nano Kit kzarn Sample Prep / Library Generation 9 09-24-2014 01:56 PM
TruSeq DNA PCR-free vs NANO DNA kit mbk0asis Illumina/Solexa 8 05-17-2014 08:15 AM
NEBNext ChIP-Seq library prep kit vs Illumina TruSeq kit? ASL Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 04-10-2013 07:35 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-02-2016, 01:55 AM   #1
Dongmei_MPI
Junior Member
 
Location: New Zealand

Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 4
Default TruSeq Nano Library kit produced largger fragemnt sizes: 600-1100 bp

This is my first time in using the TruSeq library Nano LT preparation kit, and also I was using ezRAD method, digesting the DNA samples using Ecor I and then followed the protocol in the TruSeq Nano Kit. However, the final library fragments are much larger, 600-1100 bp, than expected 500-600 bp. Any suggestions on how to improve the method? Anyone have any experiences in getting larger fragment sizes when using the new TruSeq Nano kit? Thank you so much.

Last edited by Dongmei_MPI; 10-02-2016 at 01:57 AM.
Dongmei_MPI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2016, 03:48 AM   #2
huguesparri
Member
 
Location: Montpellier (France)

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 93
Default

We are using the nano kit but with a sonication step. Our fragments size are also in your range (600 to 1000bp). But it's not an issue for us as we are doing 2*250nt runs.
Did you try the 350bp insert size option? Maybe you will end up with more suitable sizes.
huguesparri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2016, 07:12 AM   #3
thermophile
Senior Member
 
Location: CT

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 243
Default

enzymatic fragmentation is controlled by the ratio of DNA to enzyme. bigger frags than you want mean too much DNA/not enough enzyme
__________________
Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.
thermophile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2016, 11:08 AM   #4
Dongmei_MPI
Junior Member
 
Location: New Zealand

Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 4
Default 550 bp insert option

To huguesparri: I selected the 550 bp insert option. there are two options, one is for 250 and 550 bp insert options. I am planning to run 2x 300 bp PE sequencing. To me, if you do 2x250 nt run, will your insert of 600-1000 bp too larger?
Dongmei_MPI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2016, 05:47 AM   #5
sweetph3
Member
 
Location: New Jersey

Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 22
Default

If you are more interested in the smaller size range of your library, keep in mind that the smaller fragments will cluster more efficiently than the larger fragments anyway, so you'll see more sequences in the ~600bp range than the ~1100bp range.
sweetph3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ezrad, fragment size, truseq nano

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO