I'm filtering a file with genome wide analysis of bayes factors between two stages in neuron development. What's a good minimum BF for a gene to be counted as differentially expressed? In a Nature Communications paper it seems that they used BF>20, but I'm not sure if that's just for the specific study they were doing, or if that's a generally universal value.
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
In general, Bayes Factors are a bit like interpreting a p-value and the choice of cutoff for "significance" is arbitrary. The Jeffrey's scale is one widely used suggested scaling of significance where K's >10 are "strong" inidcators of significant differences, and K's > 10^2 are "decisive" indicators of significance and anything in between as "very strong" indication (that is, that gene expression levels for population M2 are greater than those for population M1, for example).
In my experience, Bayes factors are not at all commonly used for differential gene expression, so you may need to convince an audience of the validity of the methods used to generate that file (not to mention explaining just what a Bayes factor is as most genomic biologists will have never heard of the term).Last edited by mbblack; 08-05-2015, 04:18 AM.Michael Black, Ph.D.
ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...-
Channel: Articles
Yesterday, 07:01 AM -
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
39 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
41 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
35 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
Comment