![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fewer reads after Input library sequencing | badribio | Epigenetics | 0 | 12-01-2014 01:24 PM |
Did low input library and traditional library generated RNAseq data can be compared? | bioinforD | Bioinformatics | 6 | 11-25-2013 07:57 AM |
PacBio RS II Library Prep Input | JoeChris38 | Pacific Biosciences | 1 | 10-15-2013 03:32 PM |
Library Prep with Low Input | Joltex | Ion Torrent | 6 | 12-11-2012 01:13 PM |
Number of Reads in 454 Library | foolishbrat | 454 Pyrosequencing | 5 | 09-09-2009 03:12 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: France Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Hi,
I am newbies in this forum and this is my first post. I have recently performed H3K4me3 ChIP librairies preparation with using NEXTflex ChIP-Seq kit to sequencing 18 Immunoprecipitation products (IPs)and 6 inputs as negatives controls. This sequencing is achieved on 3 Illumina Rapid flow cells with PE 2X50 pb reads. 3 IPs and 1 input have been sequenced in the same lane onto HiSeq 2500 with the new version of HCS 2.2.38 software. After Casava demultiplexing, I have getting 80 to 100 million reads with IP librairies and 30-36 million reads for input librairies. I have used 5% PhiX as a balanced genome for this experience because I have get a good results last time when we used 1% PhiX with the old HCS version. Can you help me please to understand this result. Thanks a lot. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|