![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ion Sphere ID summary, polyclonal % | The_Dark_Base | Ion Torrent | 3 | 12-23-2011 01:08 PM |
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-Array: combinatory analysis of ChIP-seq/chip and microarray gene expre | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 05-19-2011 03:50 AM |
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: Lessons for experimental design and data analysi | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 03-02-2011 03:50 AM |
Non-specific binding of control antibodies for ChIP-seq | jdub | Epigenetics | 1 | 12-01-2010 09:20 PM |
ChIP-Seq: ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip dat | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 05-13-2010 03:00 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Pretoria, South Africa Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2
|
![]()
My question pertains to the generation of polyclonal antibodies from synthetic peptides, such as those provided by GenScript, for use in ChIP-Seq. I recognize a potential problem in submitting a single peptide for antibody generation: that the specific protein epitope recognized by the antibody and represented by the synthetic peptide will not be exposed after formaldehyde cross-linking of the protein-DNA complex. Would it therefore be possible to obtain a polyclonal antibody by inoculating rabbits with two synthetic peptides from the same protein, such that more than one epitope may be recognized by the antibody?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Vendor
Location: Madison Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
![]()
I don't think the 2-peptide strategy will work because each of the peptide will be independently displayed by the immune system. I know of a few companies that are trying this approach (with a single peptide) and are having marginal success.
If you are married to using a peptide antigen, you may want to try raising a monoclonal so you can screen for the desired properties (recognizing DNA-bound protein). Here though, the major challenge is having target to use in your screening. Another thought would be to try a genetic immunization approach (like SDI). I've never tried them, but it looks look on paper... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|