SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Human Reference Genome Mucki0815 General 9 01-10-2013 11:08 AM
How to compute percentage of my genome covering human reference genome? bioinf newbie Bioinformatics 2 07-10-2012 03:16 AM
which human Reference genome to use david.tamborero Bioinformatics 4 12-22-2011 06:27 AM
RNA-Seq: Screening the human exome: a comparison of whole genome and whole transcript Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 07-06-2010 02:00 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2014, 11:51 AM   #1
FractalExpression
Member
 
Location: San Francisco

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 12
Cool Not a Big Deal, GRCh38: A Semi-Casual Comparison of the New Human Reference Genome

Over christmas GRCh38, the newest human reference genome assembly, was released.Internally we have been using chromosome 20 of human reference builds to benchmark tools and pipelines with datasets. A BWA sequence alignment of the same dataset, generated on a HiSeq 2500, across the last major release GRCh37.69 and the new GRCh38 was performed.

Quantifiably, GRCh38 is very similar to the later GRCh37 releases, showing a change rate of 1 change every 159,558 bases on 37.69 and 1 change every 156,779 bases on 38 for our chromosome 20 dataset.Ts/Tv ratios between the two alignments of the same data across the two references to be quite similar at 0.3527 and 0.3445, respectively. Back of the envelope math seems to give a Δ of +19,359 between GRCh37.69 and 38.
Annotations have a large deviation, to be expected for now.


Read the rest here: http://wp.me/pJHIj-nm

Last edited by FractalExpression; 01-15-2014 at 03:50 PM. Reason: one more figure
FractalExpression is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2014, 09:34 AM   #2
Michael.James.Clark
Senior Member
 
Location: Palo Alto

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
A BWA sequence alignment
Do you think this an appropriate aligner to use to fully take advantage of the new reference genome given its structure?

It seems incorrect to take a tool optimized for the linear GRCh37, apply it to the graph GRCh38, and then state that the difference between 38 and 37 is "not a big deal".
__________________
Mendelian Disorder: A blogshare of random useful information for general public consumption. [Blog]
Breakway: A Program to Identify Structural Variations in Genomic Data [Website] [Forum Post]
Projects: U87MG whole genome sequence [Website] [Paper]
Michael.James.Clark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2014, 09:43 AM   #3
FractalExpression
Member
 
Location: San Francisco

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 12
Default

Discussing the primary assemblies themselves, that is not to include alternate regions available for 38, BWA is an appropriate choice- the aligner isn't necessarily trained for GRCh37.

But you're right, how best to utilize the alternate regions, and updating current aligners to take advantage of that is a different question than a quick comparison for anyone considering a primary assembly remap of their data.
__________________
Petri Dish Talk
FractalExpression is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
grch38, human reference quality, remap, sequence alignment, visualization

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO