SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suggestions on trimming RNA-seq file and compare splice-junction tools results kanewong Bioinformatics 0 04-10-2013 12:30 AM
qseq to fastq - post conversion quality trimming TabeaK Bioinformatics 1 03-15-2013 05:03 AM
BWA produces odd alignment results dandyrilla Bioinformatics 2 11-27-2011 11:28 PM
Quality trimming fastq 454 data? ewilbanks Bioinformatics 2 04-14-2011 10:45 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-19-2013, 09:07 AM   #1
id0
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 130
Default Odd results with Sickle FASTQ trimming

I was experimenting with Sickle (windowed adaptive trimming tool for FASTQ files using quality). It seems like a useful tool. I used it on some 2x150 Illumina data in paired-end mode and then aligned to mouse genome (mm9) using BWA. Everything seemed to work fine. When I later did recalibration with GATK, I looked at the produced quality charts and noticed something odd. Without trimming, the two reads look very similar in terms of quality. With sickle trimming, there is a very noticeable difference between the two reads. This seems very odd to me. Why would this happen?

Here is an example for one sample:
id0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO