Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what are the output files (barcode name: no barcode) after running sequencing? super0925 Ion Torrent 2 09-02-2014 02:24 AM
Trim barcode off shis Bioinformatics 11 05-01-2014 11:18 PM
Same barcode different primers SDPA_Pet 454 Pyrosequencing 2 06-21-2013 07:29 AM
Barcode Leakage? PersianExcurzion SOLiD 8 02-11-2011 04:15 AM
Barcode of plants Fonz General 1 10-24-2008 01:41 AM

Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2015, 12:04 PM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Boston

Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1
Default Barcode Contamination - iChIP

Hi everyone,

I have attempted to perform indexing-first ChIP (iChIP) as described here: The way this protocol works is you perform a total H3 IP, then you index the DNA using the illumina adaptor and unique barcodes, then you pool the indexed chromatin and perform an H3K27Ac IP on the pooled chromatin.

After submitting for sequencing, my barcodes were found in the sample, but additional Illumina barcodes were also found. I never even purchased the barcodes that were found so I was unsure how they might have ended up in my sample?

Does this seem like a contamination at my sequencing facility, or is there any other way for other barcodes to end up in your sample?
jeremy.lopez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2015, 06:55 AM   #2
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14

Which instrument was used to sequence your samples? The MiSeq, NextSeq (I think), and HiSeq (on rapid-run mode) all perform on-board cluster generation, which means that each library is pumped through the instrument fluidics system. It's not uncommon to see a trace amount of DNA fragments from the previous library leach into the fluidics tubing during cluster generation and leach out of the tubing during the next run. This results in run-to-run crossover. Illumina has released protocols that allow the user to 'bleach' the fluidics system after each run, and this has resulted in a drop in our observable run-to-run crossover.

If your sequencing center used a cBot to cluster your sample on a flow cell, then the sample leaching in/out of tubing hypothesis is invalidated. Thus, the errant barcodes likely originated from the Illumina production line or from the sequencing center during library quantification.

Do the sequences associated with the errant barcodes 'make sense' for your sample? If they map to a different organism or otherwise don't match the expected results from your experiment, then the contamination is likely originating at the sequencing facility.
esherman is offline   Reply With Quote

barcode, chip, contamination, illumina

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO