Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Haploview VS plink for LD R2 caculating ,which is fast

    Hi everyone .I am going to caculate the R2 for the LD estimating and the data is too big(1500,000 snps in a singal chromosome)
    Haploview and Plink both can get the R2 but which one is more fasta for the big data?
    Should I cut the big data into piceces when I doing the job? How can I set the standard for cutting?

    Thank you

    My best wishes

  • #2
    Hi,
    I would probably use plink and only calculate pairwise R^2 for SNPs that are within 5-10Mb of each other. This should capture most of the inherent LD structure and help you trim the list down of pairs of SNPs that will need to be computed.

    Kind Regards,
    Jason
    Jason Laramie, PhD
    Principal Application Scientist
    Complete Genomics, Inc.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by jason.laramie View Post
      Hi,
      I would probably use plink and only calculate pairwise R^2 for SNPs that are within 5-10Mb of each other. This should capture most of the inherent LD structure and help you trim the list down of pairs of SNPs that will need to be computed.

      Kind Regards,
      Jason
      Thank you very much

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin




        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
        Yesterday, 07:01 AM
      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      59 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      57 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X