SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CLUSTAL W vs mega kaps General 3 03-18-2015 05:10 AM
Difference Values from Clustal Omega Bara'a Al-Hammad Bioinformatics 0 02-20-2015 08:05 AM
Confusion with Clsuatl Omega installation on Windows 7 64bit Bara'a Al-Hammad Bioinformatics 5 12-22-2014 01:42 AM
clustal alignment marco12345 Bioinformatics 3 09-01-2013 03:56 PM
codeml fix_omega and omega rahularjun86 Bioinformatics 0 11-03-2012 04:52 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-25-2018, 03:55 PM   #1
fznajar
Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 25
Default Clustal Omega

Dear All,
Has anyone noticed that the standalone clustal omega reports slightly different percent identities than its web counterpart? It seems that the identity values from the standalone version are some times lower than the ones from the website. It is rare.
Thanks.
fznajar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 05:53 AM   #2
fznajar
Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 25
Default clustlO

Just a follow up on my question. It seems that different versions of clusterO give slightly different results. Just upgraded to 1.2.4 and 2 or 3 of my sequence pairs identity scores changed from <98% to >99%.
fznajar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO