Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • VarScan mpileup2snp --p-value affects genotype call

    Hi,
    I'm using VarScan.v2.3.2 to analyse genotypes of susceptible and resistant plants. Sample1 is susceptible and Sample2 is resistant to a given pathogen.
    I've noticed that when using mpileup2snp, changing the --p-value can change both the genotype call and the genotype quality.
    I've included the command line and output of one of many positions where this happens VCF output followed by non-VCF output.
    Command line 1 using --p-value 0.01:
    Code:
    java -jar VarScan.v2.3.2.jar mpileup2snp in.pileup --min-coverage 8 --min-reads2 2 --min-var-freq 0.01 --min-avg-qual 15 [B]--p-value 0.01[/B] --strand-filter 0 --output-vcf --variants 0 > out_p0.01.vcf
    VCF Output:
    chr01 2827 . A G . PASS ADP=57;WT=1;HET=1;HOM=0;NC=0 GT:GQ:SDPP:RD:AD:FREQ:PVAL:RBQ:ABQ:RDF:RDR:ADF:ADR 0/0:4:57:48:43:5:10.42%:2.8014E-2:37:24:20:23:5:0 0/1:4:85:67:53:14:20.9%:2.8637E-5:37:19:29:24:12:2

    Tab-delim output
    chr01 2827 A G R:115:96:19:16.52%:8.4889E-7 Pass:29:24:12:2:1E0 1 1 0 0 A:48:43:5:10.42%:2.8014E-2 R:67:53:14:20.9%:2.8637E-5

    Command line 2 using --p-value 0.05:
    Code:
    java -jar VarScan.v2.3.2.jar mpileup2snp in.pileup --min-coverage 8 --min-reads2 2 --min-var-freq 0.01 --min-avg-qual 15 [B]--p-value 0.05[/B] --strand-filter 0 --output-vcf --variants 0 > out_p0.05.vcf
    VCF Output:
    chr01 2827 . A G . PASS ADP=57;WT=0;HET=2;HOM=0;NC=0 GT:GQ:SDPP:RD:AD:FREQ:PVAL:RBQ:ABQ:RDF:RDR:ADF:ADR 0/1:1:57:48:43:5:10.42%:2.8014E-2:37:24:20:23:5:0 0/1:4:85:67:53:14:20.9%:2.8637E-5:37:19:29:24:12:2

    Tab-delim output
    chr01 2827 A G R:115:96:19:16.52%:8.4889E-7 Pass:49:47:17:2:1E0 0 2 0 0 R:48:43:5:10.42%:2.8014E-2 R:67:53:14:20.9%:2.8637E-5

    Here is the MPileup for that position:
    chr01 2827 a 57 ,.,g,.,,,,.,,,,,......,,,,,,,,.GGGGGGGGGGGGG,,,.......... BD<!IIGHIIIIIIIAIGHHBFEHIIBCHHI9+&&*>-&9'<2-G=IHF8IIBI@IH 85 ,,GG,,,,,,,,,g,.,,.,,g,,,,,.,.........gGGGGGGGGGGGGG..........GGGGGGG......ggggg.,,,^2, IH9:IIGHIIG=I!IIDIGGG7IGF;II>GIIHBBGHH0#13427+/&(&41HIIEEDIIIH'*4*<*3HHGID@/'%%&DF#G#


    So, the key differences in the VCF outputs are that the genotype and genotype quality differ with different p-values.
    In the native VarScan tab-delimited output the differences are that StrandFilter, samplesHet/samplesRef, and the consensus genotypes are different.

    So, I guess my question is this - I presumed that the --p-value option was just a filter, filtering out sites that have a FET lower than that provided.
    It appears that the p-value does a lot more than that and influences which bases are included in the genotype calling.
    Could anyone explain what's happening here? Also, how is Genotype Quality (FORMAT=<ID=GQ>) calculated in the VCF file?

    Many thanks,
    Graham

  • #2
    Dan Koboldt has kindly given a full explanation of how the supplied p-value can affect genotype calls and genotype quality calculation at the VarScan Help forum at:

    Comment


    • #3
      Graham, thanks for the link!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin




        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
        04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      60 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      60 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X