![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question on calling SNPs using samtools/bcftools | nkwuji | Bioinformatics | 6 | 02-19-2013 09:52 AM |
calling SNPs in haploid genomes | d17 | Genomic Resequencing | 27 | 10-01-2012 07:06 AM |
GATK UnifiedGenotyper calling way too many SNPs in vcf | swbarnes2 | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-17-2011 02:33 PM |
calling Heterozygous SNPs with samtools mpileup | egatti | Bioinformatics | 1 | 07-21-2011 09:16 AM |
calling SNPs | asankaf | General | 2 | 02-04-2009 07:45 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Dublin, Ireland Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 22
|
![]()
Hi,
I have genomic prokaryotic data and I want to look at SNPs between my data and the existing published data for very similar species. However, where MAQ worked well previously with Illumina data, I now have 454 reads and the BWA/samtools workflow with the pileup command seems to give information on different alleles where heterozygosity exists. Has anyone worked with 454 data from a prokaryote to call SNPs and how so? Thanks for the help! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Birmingham, UK Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 356
|
![]()
I tend to use the gsMapper component of Newbler (supplied by Roche with the 454 instrument) for SNP calling.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Dublin, Ireland Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 22
|
![]()
Thanks Nickloman. I hadn't used this part of Newbler before. I'll check it out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Dublin, Ireland Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 22
|
![]()
Back on this topic, is GATK ok to use for the detection of prokaryotic SNPs with Illumina data? A lot of the information I'm reading refers to human data so I'm just worried I'd use it incorrectly.
The -D parameter worries me too as you need to specify a .rod file of which there seems only to be human versions... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|