Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • De novo genome assembly question: which assembly should I use?

    I have sequenced two individuals and done three libraries per individual each with a different insert size (170, 500, 800).Using flow citometry I know this genome is 332MB. Also I know is diploid and the genetic variation is not to high. I have done different assemblies for a this plant genome and found this two were the best:

    One Individual
    3 libraries
    Insert size 170, 500, 800
    Number of clean reads 70,287,710
    Number of contigs 134,557
    Mean N50 length (bp) 5,050
    BUSCO 78.54


    Two Individuals
    2 individuals
    6 libraries
    Insert size 170, 500, 800
    Number of clean reads 209,022,970
    Number of contigs 446,608
    Mean N50 length (bp) 4,010.65
    BUSCO 76.38

    I then ran PEP_SCAFFOLDER in this two alignments and got this

    One Individual
    3 libraries


    Main genome scaffold total: 136339
    Main genome scaffold sequence total: 189.946 MB
    Main genome contig N/L50: 17091/2.413 KB

    Two Individuals
    2 individuals
    6 libraries


    Main genome scaffold total: 444336
    Main genome scaffold sequence total: 332.652 MB
    Main genome contig N/L50: 83374/706

    I have two questions:
    1. Would you annotate any of these two genomes?
    2. Which one would you annotate and why?

    Thanks,
    Tatiana

  • #2
    Annotation may reveal what's not there, esp if you know from exp that a given gene is present (eg someone PCR/subcloned ). Guessing eukaryote and that you may have hit some contigs that are repeat heavy (eg contig is pure repeat), and perhaps that your library isn't traversing those repeats?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
    • seqadmin
      Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
      by seqadmin


      Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
      03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X