SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > RNA Sequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Postdoctoral Fellow (Epigenetics Liquid Biopsy Markers) - CSIRO, Sydney, Australia sci_guy Academic/Non-Profit Jobs 1 01-02-2017 04:23 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-10-2020, 06:17 AM   #1
SuzuBell
Member
 
Location: U.S.A

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 23
Default Pipeline for inferring tissues from liquid biopsy data

In many cases, solid tissue biopsies cannot be performed in humans. If a liquid biopsy is performed on humans, we can assess microRNA, RNA, and DNA in the blood. These microRNA, RNA, and DNA presumably came from solid tissues. I have read that it can be inferred which tissues these microRNA, RNA, and DNA likely came from.

If that is true, what is the general pipeline for such an analysis (at a high level, i.e. for a non expert)? Are there any resources for a newbie interested in this type of research to better understand this pipeline?
SuzuBell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2020, 05:31 AM   #2
Michael.Ante
Senior Member
 
Location: Vienna

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 123
Default

For solid tissue analysis, you have the assumption, that your observed xNA (miroRNA, RNA, DNA, etc.) is derived from one origin showing a certain 'fingerprint'. Meaning that your observation is depending on the tissue type. In such a case, you can use e.g. biogps.org datasets to perform a GSEA to obtain/rank the tissues which fit best to your data set.

In your blood or other liquid sample, you have a mixture of xNAs produced in various tissues. The "simple" dependency assumption is not working.
I fear it's not as easy to trace back from which tissue a certain amount a feature is produced. Especially, since you cannot deduce directly from an observed tissue-related expression/feature that this tissue is able to secrete the xNA into the blood.

There might be certain microRNAs / RNAs which are only produced in certain tissue(s) exclusively (for instance MUP4 in mouse lacrimal glands).

You might start with a simple likelihood model for each feature from which tissue it might came from.

Best,

Michael
Michael.Ante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2020, 03:33 AM   #3
SuzuBell
Member
 
Location: U.S.A

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 23
Default

Thank you for your response. I can certainly write some scripts that use likelihood models to estimate which tissue each feature may be derived from.

As a confirmation, it seems there are no software or published pipelines already available for inferring which tissues xNA from blood samples are likely derived from?
SuzuBell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dna, liquid biopsy, microrna, rna, tissue

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO