Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RADseq flyingoyster Illumina/Solexa 28 05-24-2018 12:14 PM
Raw read count for RN-seq usagi Bioinformatics 5 04-13-2014 03:11 PM
small rna seq with total lane read count different between conditions anle Bioinformatics 0 01-25-2012 01:25 PM
How to count Paired-End reads for RNA-Seq read counts epistatic RNA Sequencing 0 08-31-2011 02:44 PM
htseq-count with warning for every read to represent all of zero counts in output hibachings2013 RNA Sequencing 10 07-15-2011 10:19 AM

Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2012, 08:24 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Suomi

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
Default Differences in read count from barcoded RADseq?


I have recently inherited some RAD data sequenced on an Illumina GAII platform. The protocol used was similar to Baird et al. (2008; see end of post for link). The samples were barcoded and sequenced in lanes containing libraries from two samples (each prepared sample should have had the same DNA concentration).

My question is related to the sequencing output. I have found a lot of variation between the read number for each individual sample; there can be up to a threefold difference in the number of reads between individuals.

Could anyone on this forum explain to me the reasons that there would be such large differences in read count from each sample?

Thank you!

Baird et al:
susjoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 04:33 PM   #2
Junior Member
Location: Oregon

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4

Do you know exactly how much variation you are seeing? Often times with next gen seq'ing projects variation between samples is quite common. If it is a tremendous difference I might be a little concerned but if it's not too much it shouldn't effect things too much.

If you are just curious about the reasons, here are a few:
1) different starting gDNA concentrations
2) different starting gDNA qualities
3) different starting primer/barcode concentrations
4) different starting primer/barcode qualities
5) PCR bias
6) Enzymatic digestion variance
7) sequencing variability (even multiplexed nextera samples are variable)
8) variable base calling (not likely)

Hope that helps!

jboone123 is offline   Reply With Quote

illumina, radseq, read count.

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO