Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Compare difference capture technologies

    Please let me know if I'm posting in the wrong place.

    My question that since there are so many different exome capture technologies, is there any tool for comparing all of them ?

    My purpose is that we have a list of variants (SNP) across whole genome, and we want to know which exon capture technology can cover most of them. Is there any tool can do this ?

    I know that I can of course try to customize the capture region just like target-re-sequencing, but it's not very cost efficient.

    Can anyone help ? Thank you so much.

  • #2
    Easiest way is to get coordinates of your snps and use bedtools to intersect with each exome provider's target set (which are readily available from their website).

    Pick the one that covers the broadest part of your target set, and design and spike in DNA probes to cover those targets that the exome kit misses.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you ECO,

      I have tried the intersect function of bedtool. It seems can provide some basic information of my problem. However, is this the only one way to do that ?
      Because the further question is that I want have a comparison which is from region to region.

      Let's say, if I have the exon information on a list of gene, how can i know the proportion of being covered by one particular capture method ? What I'm doing is that

      1. have a script to get the (.bed) exon information of each gene
      2. compare to the capture region by bedtool intersect function
      3. calculate by excel because the intersect function can only show the overlapping region.

      Am I on the right track ? Is there any other possibility ?

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
      • seqadmin
        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
        by seqadmin


        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      29 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      52 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X