Tweet
So, generally people apply 97% similarity cut-off for species/OTUs in 16S based metagenomics. As far as I know, the 97% cut-off became standard practice with full 16S sequences. However, in 16S amplicon metagenomics we usually inspect just partial 16S sequences (~200-400 bp) from some variable region. In such cases, would it not make more sense to apply a higher cut-off value for clustering. I've noticed that with our data, increasing the cut-off from 97% to 99% increases OTU count some 5-10 fold. Our samples are from deep underground, so there's little literature to go on what would be a sensible species count for a given sample, but somehow I have a feeling that e.g. 500 OTUs is more realistic than 50 OTUs. Any thoughts?
-
savetherhino.org -
What platform are you sequencing on? I would like to see other's responses to this... I am sequencing on Ion Torrent PGM and the difference between 94, 97 and 99% is significant. I believe even within species, sometimes you only have 97% identity, or less. I don't know if I agree with you about your sensible species count. It sounds like your environment (deep underground) would not be an ideal place for speciation to occur, or a diverse population to develop-- too little movement, very static environment. So I would think it would be unlikely that too many species would develop to fill such a small niche as you are looking at... but maybe I'm wrong.
-
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...Yesterday, 07:01 AM -
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
Comment