Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BLAST+ creating custom blast database and using blast+ filtering features deniz Bioinformatics 3 07-07-2019 09:04 AM
Testing/benchmarking RNASeq DE tools marcora Bioinformatics 21 02-19-2016 04:46 AM
ART simulator for SNP detection benchmarking yhong Bioinformatics 0 09-23-2011 01:03 AM
PubMed: A novel and well-defined benchmarking method for second generation read mappi Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 09-20-2011 03:00 AM
Real biological 454 data publicly available for benchmarking Springbok28 454 Pyrosequencing 1 11-26-2009 12:48 AM

Thread Tools
Old 08-28-2009, 03:59 AM   #1
Location: Hungary

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16
Default benchmarking BLAST

Dear All,

I am doing some performance testing using NCBI BLAST and I am looking for a protocol and/or dataset that can be used as a reference for benchmarking. I already ran some tests but I am not sure I was doing the right thing in the right way. Had a look at the ancient paper by Shpaer ( ) but neither the aim of the article nor the data is really relevant from my point of view.

What I want:
- is to find bottlenecks and quasi-optimal parameter sets for different scenarios where BLAST (more precisely the BLAST sw suite: [t]blast[pnx], megablast, etc) is used.

What I did:

- downloaded the NCBI C++ Toolkit and compiled it for both production and profiling configuration (using GCC)
- downloaded the STS database set for blastn and put it into the RAM of my PC trying to minimize the IO overhead (apparently the sw is still IO bound but much faster than reading data from disk)
- ran a simple blastn search for 50, 500, 5K, 50K and 500K long nucleotide sequences - they were actually snippets from DS231696 (Fusarium data) to collect timing information.

What I got:
- profiling information for the default parameter set: the preliminar results are making sense, but I am still not sure I am on the right path.
szilva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 09:36 AM   #2
Rick Westerman
Location: Purdue University, Indiana, USA

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,104

Seems reasonable enough. I probably would include snippets from other organisms as well in order to avoid biases such as CG-content.
westerman is offline   Reply With Quote

benchmark, blast, test

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO