Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Merge from multiple libraries + tophat + cufflinks

    Hi,
    I have two paired-end sequencing RNA-Seq libraries. Both of them are from the same sample but prepared using different insert lengths. I've run tophat on both of them separately. Now I want to run Cufflinks. I was wondering if it is a good idea to merge tophat accepted_hits.bam files for different insert lengths and run Cuffllinks on the merge file?
    My goal is to detect splice variants for the whole sample.

    Thanks

  • #2
    I don't think it will matter in the end. If you are going to use Cufflinks then with two separate alignments you'll have to use cuffmerge to merge the separate transcript annotations into a single consensus annotation. At that point the information from both runs of the sample will be merged. In fact everything will probably go smoother if you just run them through cufflinks separately and follow that with cuffmerge.
    /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
    Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

    Comment


    • #3
      That's a good idea. I thought of that as well. Actually in the end I also need the expression of each transcript. And after merging assemblies, in order to estimate the expression, I'll need to use two bam files anyways. That's why I was wondering weather to mege bam files before running the Cufflinks or to do it later.
      Any thoughts?
      Thanks.

      Comment


      • #4
        Cufflinks needs to know your insert size and standard deviation. In fact it will figure it out from your alignments. Since that information is apparently necessary for it to do it's work then you should probably keep those alignments separate through cufflinks. I get you, though, you want one set of expressions not two. Right?
        /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
        Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

        Comment


        • #5
          Yes.. Is there any good way?

          Comment


          • #6
            I'm not sure if you need anything much more exotic than a mean of the two separate expressions.

            *edit* scratch that. a mean isn't quite right. calculating expressions is pretty easy when you have the raw components and when you have those you can easily combine expressions but when you only have two separate expressions then i'm not sure how to do it.

            for example, say we have some gene X of length 3400 bases.

            sample A has 12000 reads of aligned to the gene, 34,123,123 reads aligned
            sample B has 5161 reads aligned to the gene, 25,321,321 reads aligned total

            sample A RPKM = (reads*1e9)/(reads_aligned * length) = (12000*1e9)/(34,123,123*3400) = 103.43
            sample B RPKM = (5161*1e9)/(25,321,321 * 3400) = 59.95

            mean of those expressions = (103.43+59.95)/2 = 81.69

            RPKM of merged samples = ((12000+5161)*1e9)/((34,123,123+25,321,321)*3400) = 84.91

            the weighted mean works but you need to know the # of millions of mapped reads to use as the weights:

            weighted mean of samples = (103.43*34,123,123 + 59.95*25,321,321)/(34,123,123+25,321,321) = 84.91

            i don't think cufflinks reports what the normalization factor is it uses for FPKM calculation so i'm not sure you'll find an easy way to merge them. I guess you have no choice but to run them combined as a single BAM.
            Last edited by sdriscoll; 04-30-2012, 04:35 PM.
            /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
            Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • seqadmin
              Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
              by seqadmin


              Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
              04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
            • seqadmin
              Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
              by seqadmin


              Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
              03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
            0 responses
            46 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X