![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
duplicate reads removal | vasvale | Bioinformatics | 19 | 01-08-2015 12:59 AM |
duplicate read removal | gab0 | Bioinformatics | 14 | 10-02-2014 03:20 PM |
some basic questions about duplicate removal ? | a_mt | Bioinformatics | 1 | 06-27-2014 09:14 AM |
Trinity-Duplicate removal | reema | Bioinformatics | 2 | 02-27-2014 01:49 AM |
threshold for duplicate removal? | mard | Bioinformatics | 2 | 03-21-2010 03:45 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Davis, CA Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Hi All,
Our Illumina FAS mentioned that in underloaded lanes on the patterned flow-cells even PCR-free libraries can generate significant numbers of duplicates (clusters swapping over the "walls" into the next empty nanowell if given enough time?). http://dnatech.genomecenter.ucdavis....data-download/ Would you know of any software that can analyze/remove duplicates based on the coordinate information in the read headers (without any alignments)? Thanks in advance, Lutz Last edited by DNATECH; 05-07-2015 at 06:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,143
|
![]()
I doubt that software for this exists in the wild since you are asking for a very specific operation based on the location of the cluster for a condition that may occur with a relatively new technology (unless those sites that have had HiSeq X Ten have implemented something for this). Wonder if illumina can include mitigation for that in bcl2fastq itself.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Davis, CA Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Hi GenoMax,
Thanks! Currently there are no local duplicate metrics in the SAV viewer and no options in bcl2fastq for flagging or filtering for these cases. People working with X Ten data get their data already aligned and might be able to use picard etc.? However the HiSeq 3000/4000 will be used for all kinds of applications were alignment based analyses are not an option. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,143
|
![]() Quote:
I was wondering if this would be something illumina should implement in bcl2fastq software, specially if duplicates will be a problem with less than perfect libraries. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Vendor
Location: Eugene, OR Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 523
|
![]()
They should merge duplicate reads in contiguous wells for extra-high quality!
__________________
Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,318
|
![]()
These would look like "optical duplicates", no?
I remember a recent thread where these were found in some MiSeq runs at high frequency. -- Phillip |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,318
|
![]() Quote:
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50115 Looks like "Picard MarkDuplicates" was used. -- Phillip |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|