![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STACKS and PE Illumina Data (ddRAD) | Carcharodon | Bioinformatics | 0 | 07-13-2017 06:09 PM |
PCR index primers for Illumina RNA-Seq | kgoglin | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 02-02-2017 01:25 PM |
adaptors and primers Nextera kit: modified or not? | Simone78 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 7 | 07-29-2016 12:03 AM |
Illumina PE primers | Zebrafish | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 05-11-2012 09:29 AM |
Illumina Primers | Will | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 08-10-2009 09:08 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Spain Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Hello, my ddRAD libraries (mean 550 pb) contain the first 5 identical bases at their ends, belonging to the partial restriction site. They will be paired-end sequenced in a MiSeq. I would like to modify the Illumina sequencing primers by adding those 5 bases at the 3 prime end of each primer. Thus, a higher diversity is expected in the first sequenced bases and also an adequate cluster generation. Does anyone have experience with this approach? and the use or not, and its PhiX concentration. Thank you. Best regards.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: US Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 360
|
![]()
It could work - however you will not be able to sue the PhiX libraries as spike in since you will can't use the Illumina sequencing primers together with your extended versions.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Spain Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Thank you. It is right. So the question is what can work best. 1) Use modified primers to bypass the restriction site or 2) use a high concentration of PhiX (how much?).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
ddrad, illumina, seq primers |
Thread Tools | |
|
|