Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Limma multifactor experiment design matrix

    Hi, so I am very confused as to how I can make a multifactor design for limma RNA differential expression. I've read other posts in different forums and none of the answers are very explicit (to me) as to how to build a multifactor design

    For examples, say I have p1N, p1T, p2N, and p2T, where p# is patient number and N/T is normal tumor.

    I can build a single factor design matrix like this:

    ------Normal------Tumor
    1 ------ 1 --------- 0
    2 ------ 0 --------- 1
    3 ------ 1 --------- 0
    4 ------ 0 --------- 1

    I am completely lost as to how I can build a numeric matrix with multiple factors, which in this case, the factors would be patient number and N/T.

  • #2
    Code:
    d = data.frame(patient=factor(c("p1", "p1", "p2", "p2", ...)),
                   condition=factor(c("N", "T", "N", "T", ...)))
    design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)
    N.B., I've likely made a typo somewhere, but that's the gist.

    Comment


    • #3
      Oh, I thought I had to manually build a numeric matrix for the design matrix. Thanks. I have a followup question. I understand that the intercept column that is resulted is used for pair wise comparison. My question is when to use:

      design = model.matrix(~0+patient + condition, d)
      as opposed to this
      design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)

      Ok I found this from another post:

      EDIT:
      "This [design = model.matrix(~0+patient + condition, d)] (a cell means model) simply computes the mean expression for each group, and then you have to make all contrasts explicitly. The [design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)] has an implicit contrast (everything is a comparison to control), so you have to make contrasts for some comparisons, but not for others."

      from https://support.bioconductor.org/p/57268/


      So is it safe to say this only matters if I am doing a contrast matrix comparison?
      Last edited by Lugalbanda; 10-18-2016, 09:35 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Correct, the "0+" is only needed if you want to specify contrasts, which aren't needed to answer your question.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
          by seqadmin


          Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
          03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        46 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X