SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raw error rate calculation: JohnK Bioinformatics 1 12-28-2010 03:09 PM
454 Titanium error rate ? 454fungi 454 Pyrosequencing 0 09-14-2010 02:06 AM
Need script to estimate error rate Melissa Bioinformatics 1 04-22-2010 11:31 PM
454 homopolymer error rate joa_ds 454 Pyrosequencing 10 12-18-2009 11:33 AM
high first base error rate bioinfosm Illumina/Solexa 4 08-05-2009 03:03 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2009, 03:51 PM   #1
der_eiskern
Member
 
Location: California

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 46
Lightbulb error rate

has anyone attempted to use a program like novoalign to better estimate the actual error rate of illumina sequencing protocol? i saw some discussion here a while ago.

i saw an estimate here although i'm not clear what the source was: ~180 errors per 100 of 2x36bp reads

i've seen some work this year on minimizing the effect of an intrinsic error rate on mappability using parent-child clustering but i haven't seen any new data on what the likely true error rate is. I would think that a robust aligner like NovoAlign - since it can align with up to 7 mismatches in SE reads (in my hands this amounts to >60% of all reads unmappable by MAQ) - would provide better estimate of error rate than the illumina method...which i'm unsure what that method actually is but my experience with SOLiD and Illumina make me think that it's an underestimate.

Thanks for conversing!
der. (Todd)
der_eiskern is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO