Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Microarray Signal Intensity values Published data

    Hi,
    I have one question regarding microarrays,I was checking Published data, and they published signal intensity values for Affymetrix Probe Ids
    NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a public archive and resource for gene expression data.

    NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a public archive and resource for gene expression data.

    I wanted to check the expression of certain genes in that dataset, so I annotated the Affy_Ids to Gene names

    Eg:
    File Affy_Id Sig.Intensity Gene Species Description
    NEB_RA_rep1_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 130.05 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep1_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 469.84 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep2_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 104.99 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep2_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 420.72 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep3_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 67.26 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep3_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 290 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33


    I see that for each condition, there are two Affy_Ids annotating to the same gene , with different intensity values. Its confusing to judge the intensity value for a gene in particular condition..
    Any suggestions??

  • #2
    Not many genes have more than 1 probeset mapping to them.

    In the cases where there is more than 1 probeset mapping to the gene,
    it could be that there was evidence for alternative splicing when the array was designed, and the different probesets may represent different transcripts.

    Have a look at the Affymetrix web site, at the NetAffx analysis center, and the UCSC browser for more information.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by mastal View Post
      Not many genes have more than 1 probeset mapping to them.

      In the cases where there is more than 1 probeset mapping to the gene,
      it could be that there was evidence for alternative splicing when the array was designed, and the different probesets may represent different transcripts.

      Have a look at the Affymetrix web site, at the NetAffx analysis center, and the UCSC browser for more information.
      There are other cases of genes where this kind of situation I can see.. But if thats the case of different transcripts.. seems like it wont give easy solution when we want to eye-pick the genes based on signal intensities and judge for the expression??

      Comment


      • #4
        No, it's not easy for those type of cases.

        Where did you get the probe annotations from?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mastal View Post
          No, it's not easy for those type of cases.

          Where did you get the probe annotations from?
          I used DAVID gene_Id conversion tool to annotate affy_Id to gene_names

          Comment


          • #6
            Signal Intensity?

            Hello

            Does the signal intensity value (Affy data) is the related with the expression value of genes? Also, I am curious to know if these value is comparable between different probe from 1 dataset and will help to conclude gene1 is expressed higher than gene2 ?

            Thanks in advance.
            Last edited by jeni; 10-27-2014, 08:08 AM.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • seqadmin
              Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
              by seqadmin


              The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
              Yesterday, 07:01 AM
            • seqadmin
              Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
              by seqadmin


              Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
              04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
            0 responses
            39 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
            0 responses
            41 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
            0 responses
            55 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X