SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Code to split paired end MiSeq data? akjones Bioinformatics 3 12-04-2013 08:17 AM
75+35 Pair-end SOLiD RNA-seq data analysis endether SOLiD 11 12-12-2012 04:40 PM
how to combine pair end data into one file forget1997 Bioinformatics 6 06-19-2011 01:45 PM
What is this strand specific pair-end RNA-seq data? xhuister Bioinformatics 2 09-14-2010 06:34 AM
public paire end (mate pair) transcriptome data set? iqc Bioinformatics 2 11-12-2009 12:18 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2015, 10:02 AM   #1
golharam
Member
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 55
Default MiSeq FastQ Header for pair-end data

So the Miseq fastq header for pair-end data has changed. I used to see a /1 or /2 at the end of the read name. Now I get something like this for the first read:

@HWI:1:X:2:1101:1094:2143 1:N:0: CGGCTATG-ATAGAGGC

and this for the second read:

@HWI:1:X:2:1101:1094:2143 4:N:0: CGGCTATG-ATAGAGGC

I've seen the the number 3 or 4 in the second read but not sure what they mean, and haven't seen an explanation anywhere. Does anyone know what this number signifies?
golharam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2015, 10:41 AM   #2
Brian Bushnell
Super Moderator
 
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,707
Default

That's good to know; I had only seen 2 for read 2 - now I need to update my header-detection routines. I imagine it has to do with how the machine counts sequencing phases for dual-index:

1: Read 1
2: Barcode 1
3: Barcode 2
4: Read 2

It's not unusual for Illumina to randomly change stuff like that with software updates, which is pretty annoying.
Brian Bushnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2015, 11:49 AM   #3
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,076
Default

Can you tell us where the data was analyzed, on instrument/in BaseSpace? Was the analysis done using standard parameters (i.e. no separate fastq files for tag reads).
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2015, 02:06 PM   #4
kcchan
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 184
Default

If the headers are starting with @HWI it's almost certainly generated using BCL2FASTQ and not MiSeq Reporter, which uses @M0xxxx.
kcchan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO