Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by lac302 View Post
    My last run worked fine even overclustered at 1800k/mm2, 85%PF.
    I got one of that cartridges

    Our FAS said that Illumina wants to release "the new" V3 kit after Summer.
    The last V3 kit we used as a V2 2x250 cycles, the difference is that the V3 got more tiles, so, more data even with the 2x250.

    V2 kit its the best kit, in terms of quality and less sensible to overclustering. If Illumina change the V2 kit tiles from 28 to 38 tiles, it would be the best of both worlds.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by lac302 View Post
      Is this only an issue for amplicon sequencing? I haven't run a V3 600 cycle kit in a few months but have a library to sequence next week...WGS, FastQ only.

      My last run worked fine even overclustered at 1800k/mm2, 85%PF.

      I typically run the 600 cycle kits at 2x275. Quality over quantity is fine for my needs.
      I think you will find your logic is unsound, a 2x300 kit that only "works" at 2x275 "sometimes" is not quality!

      Do you think you could share the Q Score graphs? would be interesting!

      Comment


      • #63
        Hello there,

        I am running my bacterial library using Miseq V3. The Q30 is now 83.1% after 250 cycles, yesterday it was 96% after 70 cycles. But rest of the parameters are consistent: clusters PF 91.4%, cluster density 1092K/mm^2, which are the same as yesterday. Do you speculate anything? DO you think that the run will be still okay?

        Many thanks.

        Shimul

        Comment


        • #64
          Illumina's "Q30" values are completely fabricated; I suggest you ignore them. If you want to know the actual quality of your reads, you need to map them. For example:

          bbmap.sh in=reads.fq ref=ref.fa mhist=mhist.txt qhist=qhist.txt qahist=qahist.txt

          This will give you histograms of the actual quality of your reads.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Shimul View Post
            Hello there,

            I am running my bacterial library using Miseq V3. The Q30 is now 83.1% after 250 cycles, yesterday it was 96% after 70 cycles. But rest of the parameters are consistent: clusters PF 91.4%, cluster density 1092K/mm^2, which are the same as yesterday. Do you speculate anything? DO you think that the run will be still okay?

            Many thanks.

            Shimul
            Run is fine and you would expect Q30 drop a bit more as cycle number increases. Read 2 quality will be lower than read 1 as well. Cluster density and PF% is calculated early in sequencing cycles and will not change.

            Comment


            • #66
              Mixed different 16S metagenomics run

              Does anyone have the experience of mixing different 16S 806R , 16S 926R and 18S libraries into one MiSeq run? How about mixing 16S onestep PCR libraries with two step PCR libraries?

              Thanks,

              Jin

              Comment


              • #67
                you can mix multiple amplicons

                Hi Jin,

                we do run multiple amplicons that labeled with different index primers.
                However, we do always see index contamination in very low level.

                We do two step library preparation.
                1) amplification with Miseq adapter
                2) Index amplification with different index combination

                pool library based on realtime PCR result.
                Last edited by d00b; 01-10-2017, 01:35 PM.

                Comment


                • #68
                  The biggest issue when mixing amplicons is the lenghts. I've successfully mixed 16s v4 (~300bp) with amplicons that are as small as 190bp and as large as 450 and run on 2x250. Your q30 plot will look weird, but I haven't had any of these mixed runs fail in a way that seems dependent on the mixing. Remember to calculate nM for each length and that the shorter frags will bind better than the longer ones.
                  Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    My lab is looking at bringing in the TruSight Tumor 15 assay. It seems like most of the v3 issues are related to low complexity libraries (16s RNA-seq reads, etc.) so I'm assuming that we'll be okay with the TST15? I'm wondering if we'll run into problems with some of our other methods, though. We also run the Archer Dx FusionPlex for RNA Fusion detection, and the molecular barcodes in assay have a low complexity region in read 1.

                    Does anyone have any experience with TST15 or other assays (aside from 16s rRNA) on the v3 chemistry?

                    Thanks!

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    • seqadmin
                      Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
                      by seqadmin



                      The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

                      Avian Conservation
                      Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
                      03-08-2024, 10:41 AM
                    • seqadmin
                      The Impact of AI in Genomic Medicine
                      by seqadmin



                      Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a futuristic vision to a mainstream technology, highlighted by the introduction of tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini. In recent years, AI has become increasingly integrated into the field of genomics. This integration has enabled new scientific discoveries while simultaneously raising important ethical questions1. Interviews with two researchers at the center of this intersection provide insightful perspectives into...
                      02-26-2024, 02:07 PM

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by seqadmin, 03-14-2024, 06:13 AM
                    0 responses
                    34 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post seqadmin  
                    Started by seqadmin, 03-08-2024, 08:03 AM
                    0 responses
                    72 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post seqadmin  
                    Started by seqadmin, 03-07-2024, 08:13 AM
                    0 responses
                    81 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post seqadmin  
                    Started by seqadmin, 03-06-2024, 09:51 AM
                    0 responses
                    68 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post seqadmin  
                    Working...
                    X