![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
output info from samtools pileup? | shuang | Bioinformatics | 1 | 09-26-2011 04:35 PM |
SAMtools pileup output | zippered_ohio | Bioinformatics | 1 | 09-08-2011 01:27 PM |
pileup output different using Maq and Samtools commands | mr_boourns | Bioinformatics | 1 | 03-31-2011 03:05 AM |
samtools pileup output file | charlie_sequencing | Bioinformatics | 1 | 02-10-2011 12:51 PM |
samtools pileup output for SNP detection | Mansequencer | Bioinformatics | 1 | 09-08-2010 06:36 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: India Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 35
|
![]()
I tried to call consensus using samtools pileup from the filtered BAM file which has only reads with no mate. But the result was empty. The following is what I did:
1) From the complete BAM, I extracted reads (mapQV >8) which have no mate (mate unmapped) using "samtools view -f 0x8" - There are ~35m reads. 2) removed all duplicate reads using Picard 3) provided this filtered file to samtools for consensus calling with options "-c", "-Q 8", "-f ref.fas" ( i tried -m, -M as well) Question here is 1) Why does pileup fail to call consensus 2) Did i make any mistake or do I modify any parameters 3) Is there any other tool can do this? Any light to this will be a great help. Thanks. Praveen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Boston, MA Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 36
|
![]()
Some tests I just did show that samtools mpileup only works for proper pairs. Can anyone else confirm this?
I was not able to call any variants until I marked the pairs with bamtools resolve. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
samtools pileup |
Thread Tools | |
|
|