SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > RNA Sequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CASIM: RNA-Seq Problems with rRNA contamination casim UK - Cambridge 3 06-23-2014 10:17 AM
rRNA & tRNA contamination in whole genome sequencing choijae3 Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 03-19-2014 03:52 PM
Eliminate rRNA contamination with Bowtie alisrpp Bioinformatics 2 01-31-2013 10:42 AM
Contamination with bacterial rRNA JakobHedegaard Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 12-13-2011 08:48 AM
yeast rRNA contamination: Illumina prep rmetz Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 04-26-2011 09:24 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-02-2014, 04:17 AM   #1
buthercup_ch
Member
 
Location: Japan

Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 40
Smile 5S rRNA contamination

Hi everyone.

I'm new in this world of NGS and HTS and I need some help in understanding some issues.
I've just received a set of sequences from RNA-Seq in Illumina Platform. I personally prepared the cDNA library to be used in the sequencing reaction, starting from total RNA from gram-negative bacterial.
To get rid of the rRNA I used RiboZero kit (for gram-negative bacteria) and the treatment was really successful, except for low amounts of 5S rRNA that still remains. But it seems that is something normal using this kit.
The expert from the Genome Platform and my supervisor agreed in continuing with the sequencing, and it turns out that the final data contains "5S rRNA contamination", what is not a surprise, of course.
I use CLC Workbench Genomics to run the data analysis. After QC analysis, sequencing seemed to be of very good quality. And after trimming, I obtained about 40% of unmapped reads, what seems reasonable. The mapping was against a Reference Genome downloaded from NCBI, containing only the chromosome.
I run the analysis to compare "non-specific matches" (max hits = 10) and "specific matches" (max hits =1) and in both cases I obtained a huge amount of reads that map with a small region, of about 119bp of the 5S rRNA subunit of 1 of the 5 operons that exists.
Running a RNA-Seq analysis against the same genome, but using "rRNA" track, instead "genes" or "CDS" tracks, I obtained a mapping of about 18% to the same region.

The question is the following. Should I be worried about the accuracy of the RNA-Seq experiment due to this contamination of 5S? Should I repeat the sequencing reaction after getting rid completely of the remaining 5S rRNA in the samples? Or in contrast, could I use the expression value obtained if I just eliminate tRNAs and rRNAs from the Reference Genome (running the analysis agains a multicast file of all genes gave almost the same result than the aligned genome)

Thank you very much in advance
buthercup_ch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 05:21 AM   #2
buthercup_ch
Member
 
Location: Japan

Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 40
Default

An additional information:
Comparing the analysis against "all genes" (including CDS, tRNA and rRNA genes) or "only CDS", the % of not mapped reads rise from about 40 to about 60%…, logical if we take into account about 18% mapping if we only consider rRNA gene sequences to perform the analysis.
But…., is that 60% not mapped reads to high????
buthercup_ch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO