Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Yeast ChIP-seq; Sonication/Bioanalyzer question

    Hi,
    I've just started doing ChIP-seq, and am having difficulty getting my INPUT and IP DNA fragment sizes in the proper size range for Illumina sequencing. My ChIP protocol seems to work fine, as I can show enrichment of a 360bp region surrounding a known binding site in my IP sample compared to the INPUT sample by pcr.

    However, our Bioanalyzer reports that the size fragmentation is too small for the library prep. This seems to indicate that I'm over-sonicating the samples. I've been following a protocol published earlier this year by Mike Snyder's lab http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(10)70004-5. In this protocol the sonication procedure uses a Branson Digital Sonifier @ 5x30sec @ power 50.

    In our lab, we have a Branson Analog Sonifier and I've tried sonicating 6x10sec @ power 20 and 3x10sec @ power 20. In both cases, the bioanalyzer indicates that my DNA size fragmentation is mostly <100bp. However, when I run the INPUT DNA on a 2% Agarose gel, I see a smear with the greatest DNA concentration ~1,000bp and no DNA below 100bp.
    Last edited by AaronS; 01-14-2011, 11:13 AM.

  • #2
    Hi AaronS.
    I think that the not real result is the agarose gel. The bioanalyzer is more specific than gel, where you have less resolution to see small DNA quantity and migration is not the same (the upper marker of a DNA HS is 10380bp, but you see all the largest fragmented sizes grouped around 1500bp). If you try with DNA 1000 or 7500, you will have the same result (you will see all large sizes grouped around 1500bp too).
    I think that the smear of fragmented sizes that you see in bioanalyzer, you can't see in agarose...you only can see sizes with more concentration (usually largest sizes but they are in correct size compared with marker, not as occurs in bioanalyzer).
    The sample that you see in bioanalyzer at 100bp, may be DNA degradation of Chip and Input. If you purify the samples by column (Qiaquick for example), and run again the samples at bioanalyzer, you will not see anything less than 150bp.
    You can try to fragment more Inputs with different times. Then you can run it in a bioanalyzer and know if you are fragment too much your samples.
    It can be a protein contamination from previous step too (it could explain this results).
    In order to can see better the DNA purified by column, you can put 2-3ul evaporated (quantitative range of DNA HS is up 0.5ng/ul).
    I hope you can solve this problem with my comments.
    Regards.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
      by seqadmin


      The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
      Yesterday, 07:01 AM
    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    44 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    38 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X