Hello. I am performing whole genome sequencing of bacterial strains and I got very variable cluster density (and hence signal intensity) over the four lanes of the flow cell. Has anyone ever seen this and can help me troubleshooting? Thanks for any suggestions you might want to give me.
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Intensity =/= cluster density, though they are related. There can be variations in intensity from imperfections in the flow cell, smudges on the surface, and focusing. Even reagent age/batch.
The first image I've attached is from a low density (150K/mm^2) and the second is from a high density (280K/mm^2). Notice that the lower density run has a much higher intensity (see the scale on the right). Despite the variations in intensity, all four lanes from the first run were within 5% (<3million reads) of each other in terms of reads PF. A similar percentage variability was seen in the high density, lower intensity run.
As long as there are no dramatic quality drops associated with the areas of low intensity, I wouldn't be concerned.
-
Many thanks for your reply. I see this pattern with all my runs despite reagents and flow cell batches though. I wonder if my library concentration might be too high and so if I am "overloading" the flow cell. The problem is in lanes like 3 and 4 I lose quite a lot of reads because at least 15% won't pass the filter. Do you think overloading the flow cell might be a possible reason?
Comment
-
Without knowing the cluster densities reported by your instrument, I couldn't say.
What are the average densities for each of the 4 lanes, and the number of raw and PF reads for each lane?
Our NextSeq generally maintains >90% PF with cluster densities up to 240K/mm^2, but the recommended spec by Illumina is 180-220K/mm^2. If you're outside of that range, I would recommend reducing your loading concentration proportionally based on how far over you are loading (i.e. if you're loading at what you believe to be 1.8pM, and getting densities of 270K/mm^2, try loading instead at 1.8 * (200/270) = 1.3 pM to target that 200K/mm^2 density.
One other possibility - Is your phasing/prephasing higher in lanes 3 and 4? The fact that both lanes seem to trail off in intensity (and presumably density) indicates a possible delivery issue. If the phasing and prephasing for those two lanes is higher than L1, that would support the idea of a reagent delivery/fluidics problem. If this is the case, only a service engineer call can guarantee restored functionality, but you could try doing a few full washes with warm MilliQ water to flush any residue/clogs from the lines.
Comment
-
Originally posted by misterc View PostNextSeq fluidics lane pairs are odd vs. even (i.e. lanes 1 & 3 get SBS pumping while lanes 2 & 4 are imaged).
Comment
-
Good point. Yes, it's the latter (separate syringes pull the fluid through each of the two lanes simultaneously). It's entirely possible thiNGS has a fluidics issue on lane 1 there, but it seems like the fluidics on NextSeq are much more robust against clogs than it's HiSeq predecessor.
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...-
Channel: Articles
Yesterday, 07:01 AM -
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
45 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
Comment