SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2017, 02:25 PM   #1
urchin
Member
 
Location: California

Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 20
Question DADA2 vs Deblur

I noticed at the qiime2 forum someone else asked the same question I have - How do these 2 compare (or perhaps contrast would be better focus?) for output other than faster speed for Deblur? The forum suggested the person ask here at seqanswers, but it doesn't seem like they followed up. Can someone tell me anything about this that would be helpful as I move forward analyzing 16s V3 region amplicons. Thanks!
urchin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2018, 06:36 PM   #2
lyang
Junior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1
Default

Hi urchin i just finished comparing DADA2 and deblur and have concluded that DADA2 is the correct decision. We use v3v4 and DADA2 gives 3 to 4 times as much high-quality data in return as deblur.

My thought is deblur is for very short sequences because it was close to DADA2 when i chopped to 100bp like in the deblur paper : but we use the whole v3v4 for better assignment. Perhaps v3 is very short? Otherwise i would recommmend DADA2.
lyang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO