Go Back   SEQanswers > General

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fail in ligation of 5' RNA adapter fangw Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 01-22-2014 08:45 PM
PubMed: Structural bias in T4 RNA ligase-mediated 3'-adapter ligation. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 06-17-2012 02:00 AM
SOLiD Barcoded Adapter Trimming DrDTonge Bioinformatics 4 12-06-2011 08:33 AM
Adapter Ligation Question johnmillsbro Illumina/Solexa 3 07-13-2010 09:09 AM
Barcoded PE adapters for multiplexing up to 12 samples Pepe Illumina/Solexa 9 01-28-2010 05:36 PM

Thread Tools
Old 02-13-2019, 08:59 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Germany

Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4
Default barcoded RNA adapter ligation for multiplexing

Hi All,

This is my first post here, so hello everyone!

I'm wondering if it is possible to use RNA adapter ligated to (preferably) 3' end of the RNA for multiplexing the samples prior to RNA sequencing? If I understand correctly (an my knowledge may be narrow here), typically such adapters are added separately to individual samples, and then the barcodes are added later by PCR.

I would like to:

Ligate RNA adapters into multiple samples, and then pool them together before performing cDNA synthesis. After ligation, samples would be multiplexed, and processed as such from the very beginning. Specifically, I would like to perform a 3'UTR (or its polyA adjacent part) sequencing, using the custom adapter-specific primer containing barcode. My cDNA library would be made as follows, (with optional polyA enrichment):

........................................................................................... <-----------

I would then use a random primer and adapter-specific primer for generating a second cDNA strand, and add adapters for amplification on the flow cell by PCR.

I can imagine such approach might lead to biases in case the RNA concentrations and/or quality in individual samples is highly variable. But assuming it is not, I see it as a sound approach. Or am I missing something?

Thank is advance for any helpful insights.


Last edited by Lechu; 02-13-2019 at 09:09 AM. Reason: layout problems
Lechu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2019, 01:52 PM   #2
Senior Member
Location: Bay Area

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 121

Very doable, although random priming isn't necessary for second strand if you're using standard Gubler-Hoffman, the RNaseH handles the priming. This Nature Methods paper from the Broad should give some inspiration on how to do it
cmbetts is offline   Reply With Quote

adapter, barcoding, illumina, rnaseq

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO