Go Back   SEQanswers > General

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Baits in WGS??? Joseph White Bioinformatics 1 05-01-2017 03:26 PM
ChIPQC: a package for assessing quality of ChIP-seq samples and experiments rory Bioinformatics 2 01-04-2017 07:42 AM
wgs assembler Rui Guo Bioinformatics 0 05-28-2016 12:27 AM
Assessing quality and accuracy of de novo genome assembly rwness Bioinformatics 5 01-31-2011 03:13 PM

Thread Tools
Old 02-03-2020, 01:05 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Chromosome 7

Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 1
Default Assessing WGS Quality

Thanks, very helpful

Last edited by grimani; 02-19-2020 at 10:22 PM.
grimani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2020, 10:21 PM   #2
Senior Member
Location: US

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 458

To me the data you mentioned are no big reason to worry. They gave you more data for the first sample, but duplicates are certianly higher than expected.
The biases visible for the first 16 nt in the second plot indicate that they use Nextera or other transposase library preps - I do not like this chemistry because it introduces more biases than necessary.
The slightly varying read lengths is very curious - I have no clue how these could have been generated.
luc is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO