Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hunting for Human Infectious Agents in Cancer : PhD @ Norwich, UK

    Hunting for Human Infectious Agents in Cancer using data from Genomics England’s 100,000 genome project : PhD Studentship @ UEA, Norwich

    Infectious agents, such as bacteria and viruses, are involved in the development of a variety of human cancers such as cervical, liver, stomach and bladder cancer. We hypothesise that other infectious agents are directly linked to cancer development, but as yet remain unidentified. We have developed an analytic pipeline (SEPATH) that identifies infectious agents in whole genome sequencing data. This pipeline is already in place, working and currently being improved. Through a competitive process we have been awarded access to apply SEPATH to the whole genome sequence data of 40,000 cancer genomes from Genomics England’s 100,000 Genome project. Genomics England’s 100,000 Genome project is a large-scale initiative, backed by the UK government, to sequence samples from 100,000 patients including 40,000 from a range of different cancer types. The aim of this PhD studentship is to run SEPATH on this data and search for new infectious agents associated with cancer in a range of different types. The student will aim to answer the following questions:

    1. Are any pathogens significantly over-represented in a particular disease compared to normal tissue and other disease types.
    2. Are any pathogens increasingly common as the tumour grade increases or are they associated with other clinical categories.
    3. Does the diversity of the microbiome/virome vary across clinical categories.
    4. Are there recurrent sequences that do not align to known organisms for a particular cancer type. This will give the intriguing possibility of discovering brand new bacteria that are linked to cancer.

    These studies are anticipated to identify a "smoking-gun" that will spark further examinations for mechanisms of disease induction in the lab.

    References

    i) C. S. Cooper, R. Eeles, D. C. Wedge, P. Van Loo, G. Gundem, L. B. Alexandrov, B. Kremeyer, A. Butler, A. G. Lynch, N. Camacho, C. E. Massie, J. Kay, H. J. Luxton, S. Edwards, Z. Kote-Jarai, N. Dennis, S. Merson, D. Leongamornlert, J. Zamora, C. Corbishley, S. Thomas, S. Nik-Zainal, S. O’Meara, L. Matthews, J. Clark, R. Hurst, R. Mithen, R. G. Bristow, P. C. Boutros, M. Fraser, S. Cooke, K. Raine, D. Jones, A. Menzies, L. Stebbings, J. Hinton, J. Teague, S. McLaren, L. Mudie, C. Hardy, E. Anderson, O. Joseph, V. Goody, B. Robinson, M. Maddison, S. Gamble, C. Greenman, D. Berney, S. Hazell, N. Livni, C. Fisher, C. Ogden, P. Kumar, A. Thompson, C. Woodhouse, D. Nicol, E. Mayer, T. Dudderidge, N. C. Shah, V. Gnanapragasam, T. Voet, P. Campbell, A. Futreal, D. Easton, A. Y. Warren, C. S. Foster, M. R. Stratton, H. C. Whitaker, U. McDermott, D. S. Brewer, and D. E. Neal, “Analysis of the genetic phylogeny of multifocal prostate cancer identifies multiple independent clonal expansions in neoplastic and morphologically normal prostate tissue,” Nat. Genet., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 367–372, Mar. 2015.

    ii) G. Gundem, P. Van Loo, B. Kremeyer, L. B. Alexandrov, J. M. C. Tubio, E. Papaemmanuil, D. S. Brewer, H. M. L. Kallio, G. Högnäs, M. Annala, K. Kivinummi, V. Goody, C. Latimer, S. O’Meara, K. J. Dawson, W. Isaacs, M. R. Emmert-Buck, M. Nykter, C. Foster, Z. Kote-Jarai, D. Easton, H. C. Whitaker, D. E. Neal, C. S. Cooper, R. a. Eeles, T. Visakorpi, P. J. Campbell, U. McDermott, D. C. Wedge, and G. S. Bova, “The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer,” Nature, vol. 520, no. 7547, pp. 353–357, Apr. 2015.

    iii) D. T. Truong, E. A. Franzosa, T. L. Tickle, M. Scholz, G. Weingart, E. Pasolli, A. Tett, C. Huttenhower, and N. Segata, “MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling,” Nat. Methods, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 902–903, Sep. 2015.

    iv) Wood, Derrick E., and Steven L. Salzberg. "Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments." Genome biology 15.3 (2014): R46.

    v) Chang, Alicia H., and Julie Parsonnet. "Role of bacteria in oncogenesis." Clinical microbiology reviews 23.4 (2010): 837-857.

    https://www.uea.ac.uk/study/-/huntin...genome-project

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
25 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
27 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
24 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X