Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Does anyone have any experience with the newLabChip GX Touch

    We already have an Agilent Bioanalyzer in the lab, but with the new needs (analyzing genomic DNA and NGS libraries), and with a significant increse in the number of samples we process we are about to buy a new DNA /RNA analyzer, with a higher throughput and which can also analyzer gDNA.

    Our biggest demand is the RNA QC analysis, many of the samples in the range of picograms. And the other idea is to have a good quantification system for NGS libraries, taking into account that you have to analyse their electrophoretic profile to determine the size distribution.
    So we are searching for an automatic analyzer with high resolution and high sizing and quantification accuracy, and high sensitivity for RNA and NGS library QC. Combined with the gDNA analysis

    We have demos of Fragment Analyzer (FA) (12-capillar format) and TapeStation (TS) 4200. But we were not happy with the resolution and sizing accuracy of TapeStation, even if it´s much easier to use than the FA. The resolution and sensitivity of TS for RNA samples was not satisfactory. We have very good results with the FA for RNA and gDNA, but a high variability of , even if we are a little concern about the easy of use, analysis software, and the maintenance.

    But I have seen that there is a new automatic analyzer: LabChip GX Touch from PerkinElmer. It sounds very good, the high throughput automatic version of LabChip GX, which is similar to Bioanalyzer, and you expect the same resolution and sensitivity.

    Does anyone use or test this new analyzer? Any results with "real" samples?

    Thanks a lot,
    Irantzu
    Last edited by [email protected]; 05-26-2017, 04:23 AM. Reason: I sent it by mistake without finishing the thread

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
30 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
32 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X