![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
trimming phylogenetic tree | mario1988 | Bioinformatics | 2 | 04-14-2014 07:08 AM |
phylogenetic tree construction | juannajuann | Bioinformatics | 5 | 07-31-2013 08:41 AM |
blastn and phylogenetic tree | juannajuann | Bioinformatics | 5 | 05-29-2013 07:41 PM |
phylogenetic tree comparison | shedrack | Bioinformatics | 0 | 05-08-2013 01:32 AM |
phylogenetic tree | renesh | Bioinformatics | 7 | 03-20-2012 09:24 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: India Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Dear All,
I have generated phylogenetic trees for a gene dataset by Neighbor joining and Maximum likelihood methods with 1000 boostrap replicates using PHYLIP v3.69 package. I observed in various research articles that the phylogentic trees also have a scale-bar (which mostly represents residue substitution per site). When I visualized the generated trees in FigTree v1.4.2, the scale bar unit (number) seems to be in thousands! While mostly the scale bar represents 0.1 or 0.5 such numbers. Moreover, I visualized the trees in MEGA v6, so as to find out whether FigTree possess any bug or not, but the option for statistics/scale cannot be used therein due to some unknown reasons. I intend to add a scale bar to my tree graphs, please advice me how to generate the optimal scale and value in accordance with the graphs. Thanks. Gaurav. P.S: Please let me know if you want to know about the parameters used in NJ and ML methods, if they would help you in providing a solution. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Sheffield, UK Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Sounds like you are using consense, which returns "branch lengths" which are in fact the number of bootstrap replicates which support that branch. See:
http://evolution.genetics.washington...html#wierdtree https://www.biostars.org/p/9511/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
phylogenetic tree, scale bar |
Thread Tools | |
|
|